[Clam-devel] [OS X] Scons error with apps

[Pau Arumi]

En/na Hernán Ordiales ha escrit:
> On 3/29/07, Pau Arumi <parumi at iua.upf.edu> wrote:
>> good to know it was that!
>>
>> btw, let's always answer to the list for documentation purposes
> 
> have you got access to this mailing list administrative interface? if
> you want that, maybe is better to setup the "default reply" to this
> list (you have it as an option in mailman setup)
> 
> i've recently replied one mail from this list and was a little odd
> because i had to "re-replied to all" and remove the rest of the people
> from "To" and "cc" fields...
> 
> only a sugestion, cheers...
> 

done.

however mailman doc warn you that it can be harmful in some cases. so
i'll change it back if someone complains.

"There are many reasons not to introduce or override the Reply-To: 
header. One is that some posters depend on their own Reply-To: settings 
to convey their valid return address. Another is that modifying 
Reply-To:  makes it much more difficult to send private replies. See 
`Reply-To' Munging Considered Harmful for a general discussion of this 
issue. See Reply-To Munging Considered Useful for a dissenting opinion."