[Clam-devel] dynamic types

Xavier Amatriain xavier at create.ucsb.edu
Mon Jul 16 03:49:07 PDT 2007

Greg Kellum wrote:
> Any one have anything to say about this?
I think that the CLAM team mostly agrees with your analysis. Moving away 
from DT has been in
our Roadmap for some time now but it is a big change that we had 
reserved for the 2.0 ;-) Actually
before removing DT there are some previous steps like simplifying some 
Data classes like the Spectrum
you just mentioned.

More information about the clam-devel mailing list