[Clam-devel] ladspa in-controls commit

[Pau Arumi]

oc2pus at arcor.de wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 27. März 2007 schrieb Pau Arumi:
>   
>> En/na oc2pus at arcor.de ha escrit:
>>     
>>> Am Dienstag, 27. März 2007 schrieb Pau Arumi:
>>>       
>>>> in LAC we found that most ladspa plugins where silent or crashing.
>>>> the problem was ladspa-wrapper while establishing ladspa in-control
>>>> data pointers.
>>>> since we badly wanted to hear the TAPS CEO (Chief Executive Oscillator)
>>>> (which we learnt about it last night on a bar) we started the fix in
>>>> our flight back to barcelona :-)
>>>> moreover the commit contains a proof-of-concept test of using default
>>>> values. it have to be improved (hi andreas :-))
>>>>
>>>>   * fix in ladspa wrapper: now in-control pointers are set at
>>>>     each Do()
>>>>   * ladspa feature: using default in-control values.
>>>>         
>>> switch to lv2-plugins ...
>>>
>>> look here:
>>> http://lv2plug.in/
>>> http://ll-plugins.nongnu.org/
>>> http://home.gna.org/lv2dynparam/
>>> http://home.gna.org/zyn/
>>> http://plugin.org.uk/lv2/
>>>
>>> lv2 is the succesor for ladspa (2002 vs 2006/2007!!)
>>> don't sit on "old" features ... :)
>>>       
>> well, lv2 is ok if you don't mind having very few usable plugins
>> (less than 10 i'd say).
>>     
> hm, look at the ll-plugins and swh-lv2 packages.
>
> I've packaged this packages last week: it contains around 13-15 plugins (AZR-3 
> is already available!) iand swh-lv2 contains a lot more (97!) See attached 
> list's for details !
>   

good to know! this makes lv2 more attractive.