[Clam-devel] SMSSynthesis
Pau Arumi
parumi at iua.upf.edu
Fri Aug 3 00:25:00 PDT 2007
I think it wold be more consistent and easier to implement if we
put this logic in the configuration.
I mean, the presence of audio-out port will depend on boolean
parameters on the configuration.
Agree, Xavier?
pau
En/na Xavier Amatriain ha escrit:
> That is exactly what I meant... only put in better words ;-) You got it!
>
> Greg Kellum wrote:
>> Hi Xavier,
>>
>> I wasn't sure what you meant by "doing a consistency check to make
>> sure whether the three output ports are connected or not." And maybe
>> what I am about to suggest is actually what you meant, but what do you
>> think about checking inside the networked Do() whether all three ports
>> are connected and only computing the IFFTs for those ports which are
>> actually connected? So, if only the sinuisuid + residual mixdown is
>> connected one would only do one IFFT rather than three.
>>
>> Best,
>> Greg
>>
>> On 8/2/07, *Xavier Amatriain* <xavier at create.ucsb.edu
>> <mailto:xavier at create.ucsb.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Greg,
>>
>> The SMSSynthesis class performs 3 IFFTs (not 2) simply because it
>> aims
>> at outputing also 3 different audios (one for the residual,
>> one for the sinusoidal, and one for the addition of both). If you are
>> only interested in synthesizing the sum you should probably
>> add a Do overload (another one!!! aaarghh!) and for the networked
>> version (Do without params) do a consistency check to make
>> sure whether the three output ports are connected or not.
>>
>> But, again, it does not deal with different IFFT sizes. By the
>> time the
>> Spectrums are synthesized they should be the same size
>> (because they have to be added for the complete synthesis among other
>> things).
>>
>> Xavier
>>
>> Greg Kellum wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I've been doing some optimizing this week. Trying to make the
>> > application that I've been working on run faster. And I've been
>> > looking at the SMSSynthesis class and asking myself whether it is
>> > really necessary for this class to perform two IFFTs. Apparently,
>> > SMSSythesis performs a separate IFFT for the sinusoidal peaks
>> and the
>> > residual, because it's possible that these two could use two
>> different
>> > IFFT sizes. It would be nice if it only performed one IFFT in the
>> > case that they both had the same size. Um... I have been
>> looking at
>> > the configuration file for SMSSynthesis trying to identify the
>> > relevant configuration elements for IFFT size, but actually, I only
>> > saw one configuration element for the IFFT size. Um... I've
>> uploaded
>> > an example configuration file to:
>> > http://www.gregkellum.com/temp/synthesis.xml Could someone tell me
>> > what the relevant configuration elements are?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Greg
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Clam-devel mailing list
>> > Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
>> <mailto:Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org>
>> >
>>
>> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
>>
>> <https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel>
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clam-devel mailing list
>> Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
>> <mailto:Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org>
>>
>> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clam-devel mailing list
>> Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
>> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clam-devel mailing list
> Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
More information about the clam-devel
mailing list