[Clam-devel] Re: faust status

Natanael Olaiz nolaiz at gmail.com
Wed Jul 9 15:03:55 PDT 2008


El 07/09/2008 07:00 PM, Natanael Olaiz escribió:
> El 07/09/2008 06:00 PM, Pau Arumí Albó escribió:
>> El dc 09 de 07 de 2008 a les 22:16 +0200, en/na David García Garzón va
>> escriure:
>>  
>>>> - Hey, your screenshots have Sinks and Sources with svg diagrams. But
>>>> mines no. I want them! :-)
>>>>       
>>> I don't like them too much but maybe another icon could look better.
>>>
>>> I think the faust svg feature although cool and awesome, is not 
>>> convenient for usability because they add too much elements on the 
>>> screen, which is something we want to solve with the subnetworks 
>>> feature. Making the diagram appear on user query, maybe in a side 
>>> view could be better. We can now use QWebKit to have linked svg's!
>>>     
>>
>> I tend to find those diagrams useful to understand the network --which
>> tells me this decision might depend on the user's taste.
>> I'd like to avoid doing too much work now (like having a side view), and
>> first gain experience using faust and specially have feedback of faust
>> users.
>> Anyway, I agree that we that faust-svg diagrams could be somehow
>> optional: a NE bool setting "show faust svg diagrams" could
>> enable/disable the svg embedding *when inserting a new processing*,
>> which I think it's straightforward to do. David, Natanael: do you buy
>> it?
>>   
> I do.
> Only for Faust? or any processing having the 'svg_diagram' attribute?

Sorry, I think it will be useful to enable/disable the embedded svgs for 
all. What I wanted to mean is if we want two different settings 
(Faust/all), or just one(all).

>> P 
>>
>>   
>
>





More information about the clam-devel mailing list