[Clam-devel] Bug solved for deleting Out In Ports and Out In Controls

Francisco Tufró nictuku at gmail.com
Thu Jul 17 06:49:14 PDT 2008


Hi, if we take this as a bug/feature that needs to be implemented, it also
needs to be implemented in typed controls.
I'll add this to the next patch.


On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Pau Arumí <parumi at iua.upf.edu> wrote:

> On dj, 2008-07-17 at 13:18 +0200, David García Garzón wrote:
> > On Dijous 17 Juliol 2008, Pau Arumí wrote:
> > > On dj, 2008-07-17 at 03:51 +0200, David García Garzón wrote:
> > > > Francisco, aware of this? Is that bug also present in TypedControls?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is a base class (Out|InControl|Port) thing.
> > > Actually it is not clear we can consider this (namely: ports/controls
> > > not getting unregistered on deletion) a "bug". It rather was a "missing
> > > reasonably-expected behavior"
> > >
> > > P
> >
> > We have to swap Control by TypedControls and the behaviour is different
> it
> > will turn a bug.
>
> ??
>
> Not sure to understand the point. Maybe this clarifies: This behavior is
> circumscribed in the super class which is common of all kind of
> ports/controls (current and typed)
>
> P
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clam-devel mailing list
> Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.clam-project.org/pipermail/clam-devel-clam-project.org/attachments/20080717/e47a8577/attachment.html>


More information about the clam-devel mailing list