[Clam-devel] Bug solved for deleting Out In Ports and Out In Controls
Pau Arumí
parumi at iua.upf.edu
Thu Jul 17 08:39:32 PDT 2008
On dj, 2008-07-17 at 10:49 -0300, Francisco Tufró wrote:
> Hi, if we take this as a bug/feature that needs to be implemented, it
> also needs to be implemented in typed controls.
> I'll add this to the next patch.
Hi Francisco,
TypedIn|OutControl<T> derives from In|OutControl, right? In that case
there is nothing to be done. It is all base-class behavior.
P
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Pau Arumí <parumi at iua.upf.edu> wrote:
> On dj, 2008-07-17 at 13:18 +0200, David García Garzón wrote:
> > On Dijous 17 Juliol 2008, Pau Arumí wrote:
> > > On dj, 2008-07-17 at 03:51 +0200, David García Garzón
> wrote:
> > > > Francisco, aware of this? Is that bug also present in
> TypedControls?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is a base class (Out|InControl|Port) thing.
> > > Actually it is not clear we can consider this (namely:
> ports/controls
> > > not getting unregistered on deletion) a "bug". It rather
> was a "missing
> > > reasonably-expected behavior"
> > >
> > > P
> >
> > We have to swap Control by TypedControls and the behaviour
> is different it
> > will turn a bug.
>
>
> ??
>
> Not sure to understand the point. Maybe this clarifies: This
> behavior is
> circumscribed in the super class which is common of all kind
> of
> ports/controls (current and typed)
>
>
> P
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clam-devel mailing list
> Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clam-devel mailing list
> Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
More information about the clam-devel
mailing list