[Clam-devel] Patch: Processing Tree search bar
Natanael Olaiz
nolaiz at gmail.com
Wed Jul 23 13:55:27 PDT 2008
El 07/23/2008 03:27 PM, Pau Arumí escribió:
> I was initially dubitative about this feature (because in terms of
> features sometimes less is more). But after trying it I love it!
>
> Now we should hear David opinion, maybe he had another plan in mind for
> the processing tree. Since some days have passed from the patch, I
> propose to do commit, making it easy to everybody to experience it.
> And if found necessary, roll it back.
>
OK. BTW, it could be improved a lot. It just search on the used names
(=keys=class names), and I think it could be good to search within other
factory processing attributes and, for instance, what you propose about
further documentation (that would need some options to search). But also
I think that this first implementation serves to test the interface, and
is still useful. :)
> There is a related feature that we discussed (with David) some time ago.
> We'd like to have richer (html) documentation for each processing,
> explaining, for example, what the algorithm does, its ports, etc.
>
> Of course these is no appropriate for the current tooltip. We could have
> a separate panel so that when you click to a processing, the panel
> updates with the proper information.
> I think that one option could be using a part of the processing tree
> panel. What do you think about it?
>
I think is a very nice idea. After the canvas refactoring tests (what is
taking me a lot of time... :-/) I'll see that.
BTW, in my next mail some questions about that....
Regards,
Natanael.
> P
>
>
> On dl, 2008-07-21 at 01:02 -0300, Natanael Olaiz wrote:
>
>> This patch also hides parents items when all the childrens are hidden.
>>
>> El 07/21/2008 12:35 AM, Natanael Olaiz escribió:
>>
>>> El 07/21/2008 12:25 AM, Hernán Ordiales escribió:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Natanael Olaiz <nolaiz at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I derived ProcessingTree from QWidget instead QTreeWidget, so the
>>>>> widget is
>>>>> the entire layout, with the search bar.
>>>>>
>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I think I like it more in this way. BTW, the search bar is filtering
>>>> the processings? (like in amarok)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Similar to the amarok search bar, but without configuration options,
>>> just searches the text on the items which doesn't have Childrens (i.e.
>>> processings, at least for now...).
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Natanael.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Clam-devel mailing list
>>>>> Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
>>>>> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clam-devel mailing list
>> Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
>> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clam-devel mailing list
> Clam-devel at llistes.projectes.lafarga.org
> https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
>
>
More information about the clam-devel
mailing list