[CLAM] Is this project still active (and still no Lucid packages)?

[David García Garzón]

On Tuesday 15 February 2011 14:31:44 David García Garzón wrote:
> On Friday 11 February 2011 21:05:05 David García Garzón wrote:
> > On Monday 07 February 2011 17:38:30 Pau Arumí wrote:
> > > El ds 05 de 02 de 2011 a les 13:29 +0100, en/na Mark Dammer va escriure:
> > > > I just stumbled across CLAM and find the website and the software
> > > > very inspiring. But I wonder if this project is still under active
> > > > development. The fact that there are still no packages for Ubuntu
> > > > 10.04LTS "Lucid" - what was discussed in the mailing lists since
> > > > almost a year ago makes me wonder if this project is still under
> > > > active development.
> > > > thanks for any update, Mark
> > > 
> > > Hi Mark,
> > > yes the project is well active. However the svn log is a better
> > > thermometer of activity than the web or mailing list.
> > > Lead developers/maintainers are working at BarcelonaMedia and using
> > > clam extensively for prototyping their real-time systems. Therefore
> > > the main activity is in the networks real-time infrastructure
> > > (including ladspa and lv2 plugins), the NetworkEditor and python
> > > modules to generate and modify networks.
> > > Though most of the signal processing we develop at BM nowadays about
> > > spatial audio is kept private, the CLAM infrastructure improvements are
> > > always public and GPL.
> > > 
> > > About Ubuntu packages: David is your man i wait him to answer.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > P
> > 
> > I am currently working on having ubuntu packages for maverick based on
> > subversion snapshots. Once they are ready, at your request, i will try to
> > backport them to lucid, but no warranty: last time i tried i found some
> > show stopper dependency problems. I just don't want to expend too much
> > time on that again, sorry.
> > 
> > We are few developers and package building steal too much hours from
> > developing the framework and its applications, which should be our main
> > focus between releases. While we provide some binaries when we do a new
> > release, packaging for every platform/distro/version should be something
> > that people working on those platforms do.
> > 
> > If you want to help but you can't maintain the packages yourself, please,
> > file or vote bug reports for you distro asking for maintained CLAM
> > packages. Thanks.
> > 
> > As i have the packages I will send a new mail to the list.
> > 
> > David.
> 
> Subversion based packages for maverick are built[1], just libs, plugins,
> NetEditor and chordata. Not even tested if they work properly (i am in
> natty) so please, give me any feedback on succes or failure.
> 
> [1] http://clam-project.org/download/linux-ubuntu-maverick/svnsnapshots/
> 
> Now trying to build for lucid[2], although i got the expected dependency
> problems i think i found some solutions, which won't be accepted by debian
> policy guardians but allows the same packaging work in both lucid and
> maverick.
> 
> [2] http://clam-project.org/download/linux-ubuntu-lucid/svnsnapshots/
> 
> David.

Lucid packages finished too.

David.