[Clam-devel] IFFT_base files

[David García Garzón]

I don't understand what are you saying, Xavi. The base class file is a must in 
both cases because the hierarchy has changed since i introduced FFTW3. FFT is 
not a typedef anymore but the derivate of the proper concrete FFT so now we 
have a dependency structure FFT_base <- FFT_xxx <- FFT (if implementation xxx 
is the default acording to configure options)

So the move you are suggesting has no sense at all... or i am missing 
something.


On Dimarts 15 Maig 2007, Xavier Amatriain wrote:
> In my last commit I added the declaration of IFFT_base class to the
> IFFT.hxx file for symmetry with what we do in the FFT side and because
> it seems reasonable not to have a separate file for it.
>
> Can I remove the IFFT_base files or is that a potentially dangerous
> move?



-- 
David García Garzón
(Work) dgarcia at iua dot upf anotherdot es
http://www.iua.upf.edu/~dgarcia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.clam-project.org/pipermail/clam-devel-clam-project.org/attachments/20070515/644a5bfe/attachment-0003.pgp>