[Clam-devel] IFFT_base files

[Xavier Amatriain]

Forget my previous message... I guess we are simply working in opposite
directions. And I forgot to commit my changes early on (I thought I did
but they are obviously not in the logs). I still don't like the idea of
having those files in there, but won't argue against it.

On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 01:13 +0200, David García Garzón wrote:
> I don't understand what are you saying, Xavi. The base class file is a must in 
> both cases because the hierarchy has changed since i introduced FFTW3. FFT is 
> not a typedef anymore but the derivate of the proper concrete FFT so now we 
> have a dependency structure FFT_base <- FFT_xxx <- FFT (if implementation xxx 
> is the default acording to configure options)
> 
> So the move you are suggesting has no sense at all... or i am missing 
> something.
> 
> 
> On Dimarts 15 Maig 2007, Xavier Amatriain wrote:
> > In my last commit I added the declaration of IFFT_base class to the
> > IFFT.hxx file for symmetry with what we do in the FFT side and because
> > it seems reasonable not to have a separate file for it.
> >
> > Can I remove the IFFT_base files or is that a potentially dangerous
> > move?
> 
> 
> 
-- 
/*********************************
 *       Xavier Amatriain        *
 *  Associate Director - MATi    *
 *  Research Director - CREATE   *
 *    UCSB, Santa Barbara CA     *
 *      1-(805)- 893 83 52       *
 ********************************/