[CLAM] Is this project still active (and still no Lucid packages)?

[David García Garzón]

Me neither ;-)

Just let me know if they are working for you or you got any problem.

On Wednesday 16 February 2011 12:37:23 MarkD wrote:
> David,
> thanks for this amazing work - I did not expect working Lucid packages
> so quick!
> all the best,
> Mark
> 
> On 15/02/11 17:16, David García Garzón wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 February 2011 14:31:44 David García Garzón wrote:
> >> On Friday 11 February 2011 21:05:05 David García Garzón wrote:
> >>> On Monday 07 February 2011 17:38:30 Pau Arumí wrote:
> >>>> El ds 05 de 02 de 2011 a les 13:29 +0100, en/na Mark Dammer va 
escriure:
> >>>>> I just stumbled across CLAM and find the website and the software
> >>>>> very inspiring. But I wonder if this project is still under active
> >>>>> development. The fact that there are still no packages for Ubuntu
> >>>>> 10.04LTS "Lucid" - what was discussed in the mailing lists since
> >>>>> almost a year ago makes me wonder if this project is still under
> >>>>> active development.
> >>>>> thanks for any update, Mark
> >>>> 
> >>>> Hi Mark,
> >>>> yes the project is well active. However the svn log is a better
> >>>> thermometer of activity than the web or mailing list.
> >>>> Lead developers/maintainers are working at BarcelonaMedia and using
> >>>> clam extensively for prototyping their real-time systems. Therefore
> >>>> the main activity is in the networks real-time infrastructure
> >>>> (including ladspa and lv2 plugins), the NetworkEditor and python
> >>>> modules to generate and modify networks.
> >>>> Though most of the signal processing we develop at BM nowadays about
> >>>> spatial audio is kept private, the CLAM infrastructure improvements
> >>>> are always public and GPL.
> >>>> 
> >>>> About Ubuntu packages: David is your man i wait him to answer.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> P
> >>> 
> >>> I am currently working on having ubuntu packages for maverick based on
> >>> subversion snapshots. Once they are ready, at your request, i will try
> >>> to backport them to lucid, but no warranty: last time i tried i found
> >>> some show stopper dependency problems. I just don't want to expend too
> >>> much time on that again, sorry.
> >>> 
> >>> We are few developers and package building steal too much hours from
> >>> developing the framework and its applications, which should be our main
> >>> focus between releases. While we provide some binaries when we do a new
> >>> release, packaging for every platform/distro/version should be
> >>> something that people working on those platforms do.
> >>> 
> >>> If you want to help but you can't maintain the packages yourself,
> >>> please, file or vote bug reports for you distro asking for maintained
> >>> CLAM packages. Thanks.
> >>> 
> >>> As i have the packages I will send a new mail to the list.
> >>> 
> >>> David.
> >> 
> >> Subversion based packages for maverick are built[1], just libs, plugins,
> >> NetEditor and chordata. Not even tested if they work properly (i am in
> >> natty) so please, give me any feedback on succes or failure.
> >> 
> >> [1] http://clam-project.org/download/linux-ubuntu-maverick/svnsnapshots/
> >> 
> >> Now trying to build for lucid[2], although i got the expected dependency
> >> problems i think i found some solutions, which won't be accepted by
> >> debian policy guardians but allows the same packaging work in both
> >> lucid and maverick.
> >> 
> >> [2] http://clam-project.org/download/linux-ubuntu-lucid/svnsnapshots/
> >> 
> >> David.
> > 
> > Lucid packages finished too.
> > 
> > David.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> clam-users mailing list
> clam-users at lists.clam-project.org
> http://clam-project.org